Would Senator Obama be the new power broker in the Democratic Party, consolidating his grip on the party apparatus, and biding his time until a re-run in 2012? Or would the stigma of losing when all the omens seemed to be in place for a Democratic win (i.e. an extremely unpopular sitting president who is a millstone around the necks of any and all Republican candidates for national office, an unpopular foreign policy, an economic crisis at home, a 5:1 or greater funding edge in the general election campaign - excluding party war chests - the excitement generated by the possibility of a minority candidate reaching the pinnacle of U.S. power, an erratic Republican candidate, etc., etc.) doom any aspirations to future/further advancement to the presidency.
It seems likely that this would depend upon the exact circumstances of his loss. Were he simply to lose by a very small margin, this blogger would expect an initial rallying around, many tears shed at a manifestation of the so-called "Bradley effect," followed later by a pull back of support ('if he couldn't win when all the stars line up....'), especially if another attractive candidate came forth... However, if just he lost after a very contested process (that included court cases, etc.) then this blogger would expect a rallying around that would be lasting, and that Senator Obama would be the prohibitive favorite to gain/keep the nomination in 2012...
No comments:
Post a Comment